Connectionist modelling strategies

Psycoloquy 9 (30) (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Green offers us two options: either connectionist models are literal models of brain activity or they are mere instruments, with little or no ontological significance. According to Green, only the first option renders connectionist models genuinely explanatory. I think there is a third possibility. Connectionist models are not literal models of brain activity, but neither are they mere instruments. They are abstract, IDEALISED models of the brain that are capable of providing genuine explanations of cognitive phenomena

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explanation and connectionist models.Catherine Stinson - 2018 - In Mark Sprevak & Matteo Colombo, The Routledge Handbook of the Computational Mind. Routledge. pp. 120-133.
Rules and Representations in the Classicism-Connectionism Debate.Marcello Guarini - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Conceptions and misconceptions of connectionism.Ron Sun - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):621-621.
Connectionist models: Too little too soon?William Timberlake - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):508-509.
Connectionist models are also algorithmic.David S. Touretzky - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (3):496-497.
Connectionist models learn what?Timothy van Gelder - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):509-510.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
139 (#314,221)

6 months
29 (#327,597)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Opie
University of Adelaide

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references