Remarks on naive set theory based on lp

Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (2):279-295 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dialetheism is the metaphysical claim that there are true contradictions. And based on this view, Graham Priest and his collaborators have been suggesting solutions to a number of paradoxes. Those paradoxes include Russell’s paradox in naive set theory. For the purpose of dealing with this paradox, Priest is known to have argued against the presence of classical negation in the underlying logic of naive set theory. The aim of the present paper is to challenge this view by showing that there is a way to handle classical negation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-07

Downloads
137 (#321,448)

6 months
29 (#309,029)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

In Contradiction.Graham Priest - 2006 - Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.
The logic of paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219 - 241.
On the theory of inconsistent formal systems.Newton C. A. Costa - 1972 - Recife: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Instituto de Matemática.
Handbook of Philosophical Logic.D. M. Gabbay & F. Guenthner - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (2):248-250.
On the theory of inconsistent formal systems.Newton da Costa - 1974 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (4):497-510.

View all 17 references / Add more references