Was Jekyll Hyde?

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):328-348 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many philosophers say that two or more people or thinking beings could share a single human being in a split-personality case, if only the personalities were sufficiently independent and individually well integrated. I argue that this view is incompatible with our being material things, and conclude that there could never be two or more people in a split-personality case. This refutes the view, almost universally held, that facts about mental unity and disunity determine how many people there are. I suggest that the number of human people is simply the number of appropriately endowed human animals.

Other Versions

reprint Olson, Eric T. (2007) "Was Jekyll Hyde?". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66(2):328-348

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
688 (#84,442)

6 months
54 (#160,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric T. Olson
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

Animalism.Andrew M. Bailey - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (12):867-883.
“Personal identity” minus the persons.Kristie Miller - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (S1):91-109.
The Metaphysical Implications of Conjoined Twinning.Eric T. Olson - 2014 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (S1):24-40.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Survival and identity.David Lewis - 1976 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty, The Identities of Persons. University of California Press. pp. 17-40.
The Human Animal: Personal Identity Without Psychology.Eric Todd Olson - 1997 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.
The Mind and its place in nature.C. D. Broad - 1925 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 103:145-146.
The Mind and its Place in Nature.C. D. Broad - 1925 - London, England: Routledge.

View all 34 references / Add more references