Scientific Objectivity and Postphenomenological Perception

Foundations of Science 17 (4):357-362 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Don Ihde’s paper “Stretching the in-between: Embodiment and beyond” appears to me as a stimulating, topical text with a number of important arguments about human embodiment as a dynamic and epistemically relevant dimension to scientific knowledge production. But, indirectly, the text also raises some basic questions about how to describe the (current) scope of technoscientific knowledge, and the potentials of postphenomenology to deal with this complicated, multi-stable issue

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stretching the In-between: Embodiment and Beyond. [REVIEW]Don Ihde - 2011 - Foundations of Science 16 (2-3):109-118.
Observation And Objectivity.Harold I. Brown - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The scope and limits of scientific objectivity.Joseph F. Hanna - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (3):339-361.
Scientific objectivity and the logics of science.H. E. Longino - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):85 – 106.
Perception: Embodiment and Beyond. [REVIEW]Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (4):363-367.
Negotiating pictures of numbers.Morana Alač - 2004 - Social Epistemology 18 (2):199-214.
Marx and the Objectivity of Science.Peter Railton - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:813 - 826.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-08

Downloads
102 (#498,229)

6 months
18 (#617,007)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?