Halting Problem Simulation Paradox

Abstract

Claude AI determines how the notion of a simulating termination analyzer correctly rejects the Halting Problem's counter example input as non-halting.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Halting Problem Simulation in C.P. Olcott - manuscript
Simulating Termination Analyzer applied to the HP counter-example input.P. Olcott - manuscript
Simulating Termination Analyzer H is Not Fooled by Pathological Input P.P. Olcott - manuscript
Halting Problem Counter Example Input Rejected Under Operational Semantics.P. Olcott - manuscript
Halting problem undecidability and infinitely nested simulation (V2).P. Olcott - manuscript
Simulating Termination Analzyers overcome conventional halting problem proof method.P. Olcott - manuscript
Simulating (partial) Halt Deciders Defeat the Halting Problem Proofs.P. Olcott - manuscript
Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof V2.P. Olcott - manuscript
Simulating Termination Analzyers overcome conventional halting problem proof method.P. Olcott - manuscript
Rebutting the Sipser Halting Problem Proof --- D(D) correctly reports its own halt status.P. Olcott - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-08-06

Downloads
225 (#180,445)

6 months
101 (#120,402)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references