Socrates’ Ethical Argument for His Eschatology in the Gorgias

Phronesis 70 (2):129-146 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Socrates has an implicit argument for his afterlife story that concludes the Gorgias, with two key premises. One is at 527a–c, where he summarizes the ethical position he has been arguing for through most of the dialogue, regarding the intrinsic goodness of justice, the intrinsic badness of injustice, and the desirability of rehabilitative punishments. The second occurs at 507e–508a, where Socrates asserts that the universe is held together by justice. This argument explains why Socrates regards his story as a logos, not merely a muthos. It also helps us understand the nature of the rewards and punishments in his story.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Why Socrates Should Not Be Punished.Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith - 2017 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 20 (1):53-64.
Socrates' Final Argument in Apology.Mark Robert Taylor - 2024 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 105 (2):291-305.
Socrates, Piety, and Nominalism.George Rudebusch - 2009 - Skepsis: A Journal for Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Research 20:216-221.
The Phaedo's Final Argument and the Soul's Kinship with the Divine.David Ebrey - 2021 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 61:25-62.
Socrates and the Immoralists.Curtis N. Johnson (ed.) - 2005 - Lexington Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-15

Downloads
1,247 (#38,814)

6 months
409 (#11,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tim O'Keefe
Georgia State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations