Should We Kill One Owl to Save Another?

Ethics, Policy and Environment 28 (2):159-177 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, the federal government has decided to permit the killing of approximately 470,900 barred owls over the next 30 years to save the northern spotted owl. I argue under ideal circumstances, we should not kill the barred owl to save the northern spotted owl since there are other ways to conserve old-growth forests, which capture and store an enormous amount of carbon. However, given current political realities, I contend that barred owls should be killed subject to substantive caveats.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-05-28

Downloads
47 (#1,235,704)

6 months
10 (#1,169,684)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jay Odenbaugh
Lewis & Clark College

Citations of this work

Killing Owls Runs Afoul of More-Than-Human Rights.Joshua C. Gellers - 2025 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 28 (2):190-193.
Conservation Biology.Sahotra Sarkar - 2004 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Resisting Anthropocentrism with Barred Owls.Kirstin Waldkoenig - 2025 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 28 (2):194-197.
Owl Removal and Forest Conservation in the Unjust Meantime.Ben Almassi - 2025 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 28 (2):178-180.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Original Edition.John Rawls - 1971 - Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1983 - University of California Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references