How should marriage be theorised?

Feminist Theory 17 (3):285-302 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Feminists have noted the injustice of the institution of marriage and the asymmetric power dynamics within gender-structured marriages. Recently, feminists have found an unexpected supporter of this struggle against marriage in some liberal political theorists. I argue that this new wave of interest in the wrongness of marriage within liberalism reveals shortcomings from a feminist perspective. While some liberals fail to realise that instead of being disestablished, the institution of marriage should be radically reformed, others do not recognise that such a reform should be theorised by starting from our non-idealised conditions of gender inequality and from an analysis of how the institution of marriage intersects with other spheres of gender injustice. This article provides recommendations for the radical reform of marriage by following some methodological premises of feminist theory. To illustrate how the reform of marriage should be theorised, it focuses on the intersection between the sphere of gender injustice represented by immigration and that of marriage.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

After Marriage: Rethinking Marital Relationships.Elizabeth Brake (ed.) - 2016 - , US: Oxford University Press USA.
The Liberal Case for Disestablishing Marriage.Tamara Metz - 2007 - Contemporary Political Theory 6 (2):196-217.
Efik traditional marriage rites- A gender perspective.E. Y. O. Ubong Ekpenyong - 2016 - Religions: Journal of the Nigerian Association 26 (1).
Is Civil Marriage Illiberal?Ralph Wedgwood - 2016 - In Elizabeth Brake, After Marriage: Rethinking Marital Relationships. , US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 29–50.
The Fundamental Argument for Same Sex Marriage.Ralph Wedgwood - 1999 - Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (3):225–242.
Getting (Un-)Hitched.Brook J. Sadler - 2019 - Radical Philosophy Review 22 (2):257-284.
Adultery, Open Marriage, and Autonomy.Mark Piper - 2016 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):219-229.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
63 (#964,824)

6 months
5 (#1,612,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alasia Nuti
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

S.Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin - 2015 - In Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin, Kant-Lexikon. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 1995-2243.
Inclusion and Democracy.Iris Marion Young - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
The Sexual Contract.Carole Pateman - 1988 - Polity Press.
Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map.Laura Valentini - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (9):654–664.
States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity.Wendy Brown - 1995 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references