Doctrina de connotatis v barokně-scholastické diskusi

Studia Neoaristotelica 13 (6):105-128 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Baroque scholasticism the medieval semantic theory of connotation as a property of terms, originally elaborated by Ockham and others, received an ontological application or re-interpretation in the context of the theory of relations. The main proponent of this ontologized “doctrina de connotatis” seems to have been Suárez. Subsequently, this doctrine was severely criticised by the Jesuits Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza and Rodrigo de Arriaga, but also by the “princeps Scotistarum” Bartholomeo Mastri; whereas another Scotist, John Punch, adopted a theory of relations close to this doctrine. The fates of the original semantic theory of connotation, the ontologized “doctrina de connotatis” and the broader context of the relevant discussions (especially the new res–modus ontology established around 1600) document the complexity of the history of scholastic ideas, irreducible to any simple paradigm (like that of the realism–nominalism strife).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Jesuit Debate about the Modes of Union.Jean-Pascal Anfray - 2019 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):309-334.
Ockham on Connotative Terms.Yiwei Zheng - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 9:83-92.
Pedro Hurtado de Mendoza.Victor Salas - 2024 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 98 (3):293-317.
Sebastian Izquierdo on Universals.Daniel D. Novotný - 2017 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):227-249.
Hurtado de Mendoza on the “Moral” Modality.Miroslav Hanke - 2021 - Studia Neoaristotelica 18 (1):65-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-24

Downloads
56 (#1,070,839)

6 months
13 (#932,908)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lukáš Novák
University of South Bohemia

Citations of this work

Být v či nebýt v?Lukáš Novák - 2022 - Studia Neoaristotelica 19 (5):61-85.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ockham.Ryszard Palacz & William - 1982 - Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna. Edited by William.
William of Ockham.Paul Vincent Spade & Claude Panaccio - 2019 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition).
Medieval theories of relations.Jeffrey Brower - 2001 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 13 references / Add more references