Pandemic Modeling, Good and Bad

Philosophy of Medicine 3 (1) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What kind of epidemiological modeling works well? This is determined by the nature of the target: the relevant causal relations are unstable across contexts. I look at two influential examples of modeling from the Covid pandemic. The first is the paper from Imperial College London, which, in March 2020, was influential in persuading the UK government to impose a lockdown. Because it assumes stability, this first example of modeling fails. A different modeling strategy is required, one less ambitious but more effective. This is illustrated by a second paper from Imperial College London, which, in December 2020, first estimated the transmissibility of the Alpha variant.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-27

Downloads
61 (#986,689)

6 months
11 (#1,043,100)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Northcott
Birkbeck, University of London

Citations of this work

Science and Policy in Extremis: The UK’s Initial Response to COVID-19.Jonathan Birch - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):90.
Fast Science.Jacob Stegenga - forthcoming - The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Haptic realism for neuroscience.M. Chirimuuta - 2023 - Synthese 202 (3):1-16.
Philosophy of Medicine and Covid-19.Alex Broadbent - 2022 - Philosophy of Medicine 3 (1).

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Model Pluralism.Walter Veit - 2019 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 50 (2):91-114.
Twilight of the perfect model model.Paul Teller - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (3):393-415.
Philosophy of epidemiology.Alex Broadbent - 2013 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
On the method of isolation in economics.Uskali Mäki - 1992 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 26:19-54.

View all 20 references / Add more references