In defence of influence?

Analysis 61 (4):323-327 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

there is a substantial range of C1, C2, … of different not-too- distant alterations of C and a range E1, E2, of alterations of E, at least some of which differ, such that if C1 had occurred, E1 would have occurred, if C2 had occurred, E2 would have occurred and so on (Lewis 2000).

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

A Priori Causal Models of Natural Selection.Elliott Sober - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):571 - 589.
Disjunctive Effects and the Logic of Causation.Roberta Ballarin - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (1):21-38.
Advancing the Counterfactual Analysis of Causation.Ethan R. Colton - 2003 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
I Involutional Determinism.Mark Bernstein - 1988 - The Monist 71 (3):358-364.
Lowe's Argument Against the Psychoneural Token Identity Thesis.Katarzyna Paprzycka - 2014 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95 (3):372-396.
Difference-making in context.Peter Menzies - 2004 - In John Collins, Ned Hall & Laurie Paul, Causation and Counterfactuals. MIT Press.
The Counterfactual Analysis of Cause.Igal Kvart - 2001 - Synthese 127 (3):389-427.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
562 (#99,109)

6 months
25 (#404,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Noordhof
University of York

References found in this work

Causation as influence.David Lewis - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):182-197.
Trumping Preemption.Jonathan Schaffer - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):165.
Preemptive Prevention.John Collins - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):223.

View all 6 references / Add more references