Locke on sensitive knowledge and the veil of perception – four misconceptions

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (3):273–300 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Interpreters of Locke’s Essay are divided over whether to attribute to him a Representational Theory of Perception (RTP). Those who object to an RTP interpretation cite (among other things) Locke’s Book IV account of sensitive knowledge, contending that the account is incompatible with RTP. The aim of this paper is to rebut this kind of objection – to defend an RTP reading of the relevant Book IV passages. Specifically, I address four influential assumptions (about sensitive knowledge) cited by opponents of an RTP interpretation and argue that in each case the assumption is false.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The reflexive theory of perception.John Dilworth - 2005 - Behavior and Philosophy 33 (1):17-40.
Locke’s ‘Sensitive Knowledge’.Samuel C. Rickless - 2015 - In Daniel Garber & Donald Rutherford, Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, Volume VII. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 187-224.
Locke's Reply to the Skeptic.Shelley Weinberg - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):389-420.
Locke on Knowledge of Existence.Nathan Rockwood - 2016 - Locke Studies 16:41-68.
Sensitive Knowledge: Locke on Skepticism and Sensation.Jennifer Nagel - 2015 - In Matthew Stuart, A Companion to Locke. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 313–333.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
231 (#176,160)

6 months
20 (#560,208)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lex Newman
University of Utah

Citations of this work

Locke, Arnauld, and Abstract Ideas.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (1):75-94.
John Locke.William Uzgalis - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

S.Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin - 2015 - In Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin, Kant-Lexikon. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 1995-2243.
P. - 2008 - In Michael Inwood, A Heidegger Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 154-178.
S.Volker Briese, Michael Bolz & Toralf Reimer - 2010 - In Volker Briese, Michael Bolz & Toralf Reimer, Krankheiten in der Schwangerschaft: Handbuch der Diagnosen von A–Z. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
S.Peter Gratton & Paul John Ennis - 2014 - In Peter Gratton & Paul John Ennis, The Meillassoux Dictionary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 151-165.

Add more references