An analogical abductive argument to assess fetal consciousness

Philosophy and the Mind Sciences 7 (1) (2026)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Analogical abduction is a form of reasoning that combines analogical analysis with inference to the best explanation to address the epistemological problem of other consciousnesses—that is, what justifies our ascriptions of consciousness to other entities? In this paper, I apply analogical abduction to the case of fetal consciousness, focusing on fetuses at the end of the second trimester. I present a three-step recipe for constructing analogical abductive arguments and I apply it to this specific case. I argue that, given the best minimal model of adult human consciousness and the available evidence about fetal brain architecture, analogical abduction supports the conclusion that fetuses at the end of the second trimester are probably not conscious. Beyond this, the paper illustrates both the promise and the limitations of analogical abduction as a theory-light tool for discovering consciousness across diverse populations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-07-07

Downloads
7 (#2,153,295)

6 months
7 (#1,438,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Niccolo Negro
Tel Aviv University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Change in View: Principles of Reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 2003 - London and New York: Routledge.
The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?Karl Friston - 2010 - Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11 (2):127–18.
On a confusion about a function of consciousness.Ned Block - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):227-247.
Theories of consciousness.Anil K. Seth & Tim Bayne - 2022 - Nat. Rev. Neurosci 23 (7):439–452.

View all 35 references / Add more references