The Difficulty with Demarcating Panentheism

Sophia 55 (3):325-346 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In certain theological circles today, panentheism is all the rage. One of the most notorious difficulties with panentheism lies in figuring out what panentheism actually is. There have been several attempts in recent literature to demarcate panentheism from classical theism, neo-classical theism, open theism, and pantheism. I shall argue that these attempts to demarcate panentheism from these other positions fail. Then I shall offer my own demarcation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-21

Downloads
313 (#141,078)

6 months
35 (#251,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

R. T. Mullins
University of Helsinki

References found in this work

How things persist.Katherine Hawley - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Metaphysical Themes 1274–1671.Robert Pasnau - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The End of the Timeless God.R. T. Mullins - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
The Coherence of Theism (revised edition).Richard Swinburne - 1977 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 87 references / Add more references