Prognostic Birds and Vulgar Errors. Popular Naturalism in Early Modern England, 1550–1800

In James A. T. Lancaster & Richard Raiswell, Evidence in the Age of the New Sciences. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 269-293 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Magic and superstition, we have long been told, governed popular mentalities in early modern England. Modern anthropology, however, suggests that semi-literate minds are more sophisticated in their understandings of the natural world. This paper explores iterations of English popular naturalism, or thinking about nature, in almanacs and household manuals from the late-sixteenth to the late-eighteenth centuries. All apply Aristotelian principles of substance and equilibrium to the observation and interpretation of natural phenomena. These range from the interpretation of dreams to weather forecasting. From the mid-seventeenth to mid-eighteenth centuries, epistemological changes started to appear in these publications, thanks to market forces in the booktrade and shifting perceptions of admissible truth-claims on the part of printers and print-audiences. This is more complex than a simple replacement of convictions. Since older notions of legitimate experience and evidence were, for the most part, undisturbed, popular print culture was imbued with both at the turn of the eighteenth century, constituting an imperfect synthesis of ideas.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-06-07

Downloads
30 (#1,600,035)

6 months
6 (#1,502,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references