- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Athletic Perfection, Performance-Enhancing Drugs, and the Treatment-Enhancement Distinction
Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 36 (2):162-181 (2009)
Abstract
No abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Cognitive enhancement, cheating, and accomplishment.Rob Goodman - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (2):pp. 145-160.
Working While Under the Influence of Performance-Enhancing Drugs: Is One “More Responsible”?Frederic Gilbert - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (3):57-59.
Judgments of the fairness of using performance enhancing drugs.John Sabini & John Monterosso - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (1):81 – 94.
Magnanimity, athletic excellence, and performance-enhancing drugs.Michael W. Austin - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):46-53.
Philosophy on steroids: Why the anti-doping position could use a little enhancement.Brent M. Kious - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):213-234.
Memory enhancing drugs and Alzheimer’s Disease: Enhancing the self or preventing the loss of it? [REVIEW]Wim Dekkers & Marcel Olde Rikkert - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (2):141-151.
No Harm, No Foul? Justifying Bans On Safe Performance-Enhancing Drugs.John Gleaves - 2010 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (3):269-283.
Good Athlete - Bad Athlete? on the 'Role-Model Argument' for Banning Performance-Enhancing Drugs.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2010 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (3):332-340.
The Only Good Reason to Ban Steroids in Baseball: To Prevent an Arms Race.Jacob Beck - 2013 - The Atlantic:0-0.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-24
Downloads
182 (#223,206)
6 months
32 (#272,931)
2013-11-24
Downloads
182 (#223,206)
6 months
32 (#272,931)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
High altitude, enhancement, and the ‘spirit of sport’.Emma C. Gordon & Connie Dodds - 2023 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 50 (1):63-82.
Morgan, the ‘Gratuitous’ Logic of Sport, and the Art of Self-Imposed Constraints.Sigmund Loland - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (4):348-360.
‘A vision of paradise lost’: coaching as a grasshopper rather than an ant.Michael Burke - 2021 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 49 (1):52-67.
Coping with Doping.J. Corlett, Vincent Brown Jr & Kiersten Kirkland - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
On practising in sport: towards an ascetological understanding of sport.Kenneth Aggerholm - 2016 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43 (3):350-364.
References found in this work
The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering.Michael J. Sandel - 2007 - Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
Internalism and Internal Values in Sport.Robert L. Simon - 2000 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 27 (1):1-16.
Recent Work on Addiction and Responsible Agency.Gideon Yaffe - 2001 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (2):178-221.
Gene Therapies and the Pursuit of a Better Human.Sara Goering - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):330-341.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation