- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Responsible choices, desert-based legal institutions, and the challenges of contemporary neuroscience
Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):233-279 (2012)
Abstract
Research Articles Michael S. Moore, Social Philosophy and Policy, FirstView ArticleAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The new frontier of religion and science: religious experience, neuroscience and the transcendent.John Hick - 2006 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Possibility of Philosophy of Action.Michael A. Smith - 1998 - In J. A. M. Bransen & S. E. Cuypers, Human Action, Deliberation and Causation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 17--41.
Precis of Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. [REVIEW]John Bickle - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3):231-238.
Does the Neuroscience Research on Early Stress Justify Responsive Childcare? Examining Interwoven Epistemological and Ethical Challenges.Bruce Maxwell & Eric Racine - 2011 - Neuroethics 5 (2):159-172.
The natural moral law: the good after modernity.Owen Anderson - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-12-15
Downloads
208 (#194,113)
6 months
27 (#347,060)
2011-12-15
Downloads
208 (#194,113)
6 months
27 (#347,060)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Punishing the Awkward, the Stupid, the Weak, and the Selfish: The Culpability of Negligence.Michael S. Moore & Heidi M. Hurd - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (2):147-198.
Stephen Morse on the Fundamental Psycho-Legal Error.Michael S. Moore - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (1):45-89.
The Neuroscientific Non-Challenge to Meaning, Morals, and Purpose.Stephen J. Morse - 2018 - In Gregg Caruso & Owen Flanagan, Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience. New York, US: OUP Usa. pp. 333-358.
Contemporary Neuroscience’s Epiphenomenal Challenge to Responsibility.Michael S. Moore - 2019 - In David Shoemaker, Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility Volume 6. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 186-215.
References found in this work
Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind.Jerry A. Fodor - 1987 - MIT Press. Edited by Margaret A. Boden.
Intention, plans, and practical reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation