Revisiting the censure theory of punishment

Philosophia 37 (1):125-131 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a rejoinder to Thaddeus Metz’s article “Censure Theory Still Best Accounts for Punishment of the Guilty: Reply to Montague.” In his article, Metz attempts to answer objections to censure theory that I had raised previously. I argue in my rejoinder that Metz’s defense of censure theory remains seriously problematic despite what he says in his reply.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Censure theory and intuitions about punishment.Thaddeus Metz - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):491-512.
Realism and the Censure Theory of Punishment.Thaddeus Metz - 2002 - In Patricia Smith & Paolo Comanducci, Legal Philosophy: General Aspects. Franz Steiner Verlag. pp. 117-129.
Reflective censure : punishment and human development.Liat Levanon - 2019 - In Antje du Bois-Pedain & Anthony E. Bottoms, Penal censure: engagements within and beyond desert theory. New York: Hart Publishing.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
89 (#613,030)

6 months
10 (#1,111,585)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations