Three Philosophical Lessons for the Analysis of Criminal and Military Intelligence

Intelligence and National Security 27 (4):441-58 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that philosophy – in particular epistemology – has a contribution to make to the analysis of criminal and military intelligence. The present article pursues this suggestion, taking three phenomena that have recently been studied by philosophers, and showing that they have important implications for the gathering and sharing of intelligence, and for the use of intelligence in the determining of military strategy. The phenomena discussed are: (1) Simpson's Paradox, (2) the distinction between resiliency and reliability of data, and (3) the Causal Markov Condition.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Natural problems and artificial intelligence.Tracy B. Henley - 1990 - Behavior and Philosophy 18 (2):43-55.
The ethics of espionage.Tony Pfaff & Jeffrey R. Tiel - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (1):1-15.
Ambient Intelligence, Criminal Liability and Democracy.Mireille Hildebrandt - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):163-180.
Human intelligence and Turing Test.Adam Drozdek - 1998 - AI and Society 12 (4):315-321.
The case for integrated intelligence.Marcus Anthony - 2008 - World Futures 64 (4):233 – 253.
Consciousness, intentionality, and intelligence: Some foundational issues for artificial intelligence.Murat Aydede & Guven Guzeldere - 2000 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (3):263-277.
Comments on can intelligence be artificial?Paul McNamara - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 71 (2):217-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-28

Downloads
103 (#490,940)

6 months
11 (#1,045,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Mole
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

From unreliable sources: Bayesian critique and normative modelling of HUMINT inferences.Aviezer Tucker - 2023 - Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism 18:1-17.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references