Collegiality, Friendship, and the Value of Remote Work

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (1):113-126 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers have not paid much attention to the impact of remote work on the nature of work and the workplace. The overall aim of this paper is to contribute to further debate over the value of remote work by focusing on one important dimension of it – the effect on collegial relationships.I distinguish two types of collegial relationships. On the one hand, there are what I call “Kantian collegial relationships”, which have been outlined in a recent account by Betzler & Löschke. These are colleagues who acknowledge and respect each other as equals, and provide relationship goods in a fair and distributive manner. On the other hand, there are what I call “collegial friendships”. In contrast to Kantian colleagues, collegial friends are emotionally supportive and show appreciation for each other for who they are, not just because they are equals. Both types of collegial relationship must be taken into consideration if we want to fully understand why we value our colleagues.I then show that there are reasons to believe that remote work will have a chilling effect on collegial friendships. Remote workers must interact online, which undermines forms of self-disclosure that are necessary for intimate relationships to form, like collegial friendship. Conversely, I suggest that remote work, for exactly the same reasons, will have a positive effect on Kantian collegial relationships. The proliferation of remote work forces us to consider whether this tradeoff is acceptable.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From the editors.Albert W. Musschenga - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (5):493-494.
List of reviewers in 2010. - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):3-4.
Editorial Note.A. W. Musschenga & F. R. Heeger - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (2):219-221.
From the Editors.Albert W. Musschenga & Robert Heeger - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (3):229-230.
From the Editors.Robert Heeger & Albert W. Musschenga - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (2):113-113.
From the editors.Robert Heeger & Albert W. Musschenga - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (4):375-376.
Editorial.Albert W. Musschenga & Robert Heeger - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (3):217-218.
From the Editors.Albert W. Musschenga & Robert Heeger - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2):111-112.
From the Editors.Albert W. Musschenga & Robert Heeger - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (3):247-248.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-04

Downloads
87 (#632,211)

6 months
11 (#1,043,100)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle - 1951 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 143:477-478.
Friendship and the self.Dean Cocking & Jeanette Kennett - 1998 - Ethics 108 (3):502-527.
Meaningful work.Adina Schwartz - 1982 - Ethics 92 (4):634-646.
Privacy, intimacy, and personhood.Jeffrey Reiman - 1976 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1):26-44.
Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation.Julie C. Inness - 1996 - New York, US: OUP Usa.

View all 21 references / Add more references