Human equality and the impermissibility of abortion: a response to Bozzo

Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (3):209-211 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I have recently offered a defence of human equality, and consequently an argument against abortion. This has been objected to by Bozzo, on the grounds that my account of human equality is unclear and could be grounded in utilitarian or Kantian ethics, that my account struggles to ground the permissibility of therapeutic abortions, and that my proposed foundation for human equality itself is parasitic on a scalar property which generates the same difficulties I am attempting to solve. I provide an account of human equality which cannot easily be grounded in utilitarianism or Kantianism, offer a variety of defences of therapeutic abortion consistent with treating the mother and child equally, and show that even if the value of humanness is ultimately grounded in a scalar quality, my argument succeeds.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-19

Downloads
152 (#278,621)

6 months
27 (#347,060)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Calum Miller
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

Fetuses are not adult humans: a response to Miller on abortion.Ben Saunders - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (11):768-769.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Human equality arguments against abortion.Calum Miller - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (8):569-572.
Scourges: Why Abortion Is Even More Morally Serious than Miscarriage.Calum Miller - 2023 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 48 (3):225-242.
Subhumans, human flourishing and abortion: a reply to Räsänen.Calum Miller - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (8):575-577.
Abortion and the basis of equality: a reply to Miller.Alexander Bozzo - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (3):207-208.

Add more references