Martin Heidegger’s Ambivalent Stance toward Modern Technology

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 30 (2):313-331 (2026)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article introduces a new perspective on Heidegger’s thinking about modern technology as a mode of revealing, within the horizon of which everything that exists stands by as a resource. Thus understood, modern technology is a “danger” for Heidegger, first, because its totalizing logic threatens to exhaust all revealing, to lock everything, including human beings, into the order of resources; and second, because it induces the image of a human subject as the master of her machine-tools. What these two dangers—i.e., dominance and mastery—have in common is that they misrepresent the unconcealment of being. Against the view that Heidegger wants to preserve a degree of humanity from technology’s grip by retrieving its original sense in the Greek poiesis, I advance the view that only by suffering through the non-truths of mastery and dominance can the human being open to the “essence” of modern technology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-03-19

Downloads
40 (#1,376,932)

6 months
40 (#206,647)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Janar Mihkelsaar
University of Jyväskylä (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations