How We Stand Before Things to Come: Cavell as Reader of Emerson, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Benjamin

International Journal of Philosophical Studies 34 (3):417-438 (2026)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Beneath Stanley Cavell’s philosophy for the future lies a view of history and historicity expressed by the ideas of ‘declining decline’ and ‘finding as founding’. In this article, I analyze how such ideas arise from readings of Emerson, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Benjamin. In his dialogues with these thinkers, Cavell engages with issues in the philosophy of history that are mostly absent from discussions of human life within the analytic tradition. I claim that Cavell’s notion of the ordinary is as much inherited from this engagement as from the philosophies of language of Austin and Wittgenstein. I end by suggesting that despite Cavell’s fascination with Heidegger, his philosophy for the future is in fact closer to Benjamin in the way they both conceive relations between art and the ordinary.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stanley Cavell’s Argument of the Ordinary.Avner Baz - 2018 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 7 (2):9-48.
C889Coda—American Pastoral.Stephen Mulhall - 2026 - In Philosophy's Version of Pastoral: The Sense and Sensibility of Ordinary Language in J. L. Austin and William Empson. Oxford United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the): Oxford University Press.
Contending with Stanley Cavell.Stanley Cavell & Russell B. Goodman (eds.) - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Cavell and the Quest for a Voice.Sofia Miguens - 2021 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 9 (9).
Logic and Voice.Espen Hammer - 2021 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 9 (9).

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-09-17

Downloads
29 (#1,622,658)

6 months
17 (#692,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sofia Miguens
Universidade do Porto

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations