Marginal Humans, The Argument From Kinds, And The Similarity Argument

Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 5 (1):47-63 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I will examine two responses to the argument from marginal cases; the argument from kinds and the similarity argument. I will argue that these arguments are insufficient to show that all humans have moral status but no animals do. This does not prove that animals have moral status but it does shift the burden of proof onto those who want to maintain that all humans are morally considerable, but no animals are.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Argument from Marginal Cases: is species a relevant difference.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):225-235.
Moral Status of Animals from Marginal Cases.Julia Tanner - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone, Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 263–264.
A Defense of the Argument from Marginal Cases.Benjamin Elmore - 2025 - Journal of Animal Ethics 15 (2):127-137.
Natural Law and Animal Rights.Gary Chartier - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (1):33-46.
Is the argument from marginal cases obtuse?Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):223–232.
The Scope of the Argument from Species Overlap.Oscar Horta - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (2):142-154.
Hsiao on the Moral Status of Animals: Two Simple Responses.Timothy Perrine - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (5):927-933.
Experimentation on humans and nonhumans.Evelyn B. Pluhar - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):333-355.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-11-08

Downloads
172 (#237,984)

6 months
11 (#1,085,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julia Tanner
Durham University

References found in this work

The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.Charles Darwin - 1871 - New York: Plume. Edited by Carl Zimmer.
Morals by agreement.David Gauthier - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Principia ethica.George Edward Moore - 1903 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Thomas Baldwin.
Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1983 - University of California Press.

View all 78 references / Add more references