Prescribing cannabis: freedom, autonomy, and values

Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):333-336 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In many Western jurisdictions cannabis, unlike most other psychoactive drugs, cannot be prescribed to patients even in cases where medical professionals believe that it would ease the patient’s pain or anxiety. The reasons for this prohibition are mostly ideological, although medical and moral arguments have been formulated to support it. In this paper, it is argued that freedom, properly understood, provides a sound ethical reason to allow the use of cannabis in medicine. Scientific facts, appeals to harm and autonomy, and considerations of symbolic value cannot consistently justify prohibitions

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

What Is Medical Cannabis?Jussi Jylkkä & Aleksi Hupli - 2024 - In Rob Lovering, The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Psychoactive Drug Use. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 155-177.
The unlikely legalization of medical cannabis in Albania: a case study.Gentian Vyshka - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 12.
The Great Escape.Charles Taliaferro & Michel Le Gall - 2010 - In Fritz Allhoff & Dale Jacquette, Cannabis Philosophy for Everyone. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 77–89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
184 (#220,036)

6 months
41 (#207,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Two concepts of liberty.Ronald Dworkin - 1991 - In Isaiah Berlin, Edna Ullmann-Margalit & Avishai Margalit, Isaiah Berlin: a celebration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 100--109.
Two Concepts of Liberty.Colmán Ó Huallacháin - 1959 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 9:176-181.
Liberal Neutrality, Autonomy, and Drug Prohibitions.Douglas N. Husak - 2000 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (1):43-80.

Add more references