Testing four nudges in socially responsible investments: Default winner by inertia

Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 33 (3):392-415 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Socially responsible investments (SRI) suffer from a lack of investments from individual investors, despite their positive attitudes toward SRI. This attitude–behavior gap is a serious issue, as SRI is often perceived as a way to promote sustainable development. We investigate nudges, especially the default option, as a way to encourage SRI. In a pre-registered study conducted in October 2021 with 1050 US investors, we pit four nudges against one another to encourage individual investors to invest in SRI. All nudges significantly increased investment in SRI compared with the control group. Making SRI the default option with frictions to opt-out is the most efficient intervention. This is closely followed by a default option without friction to opt out and option partitioning, which are not significantly different from each other. Precommitment, although statistically significant, has a modest effect on investment in SRI and is inferior to the other nudges. Overall, the two types of default as well as option partitioning are significant and impactful solutions for increasing investment in SRI.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Climate change shocks and socially responsible investments.Franco Fiordelisi, Giuseppe Galloppo & Viktoriia Paimanova - 2022 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 32 (1):40-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-27

Downloads
76 (#763,797)

6 months
24 (#411,685)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Conflict of Interest.Henk ten Have & Maria do Céu Patrão Neves - 2021 - In Henk ten Have & Maria do Céu Patrão Neves, Dictionary of Global Bioethics. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 345-346.
The Ethics of Influence: Government in the Age of Behavioral Science.Cass R. Sunstein (ed.) - 2016 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Nudging for Judging that p.Oscar A. Piedrahita & Vermaire Matthew - forthcoming - The Philosophical Quarterly.
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making.Shane Frederick - 2005 - Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (4):25-42.

View all 13 references / Add more references