Questioning South Africa’s ‘Genetic Link’ Requirement for Surrogacy

South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 7 (1):34-39 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

South African law currently forbids those seeking to arrange a surrogate motherhood agreement from creating a child that will not be genetically related to at least one of them. For a surrogacy contract to be legally valid, there must be a ‘genetic link’ between the child created through a surrogate and the parents who will raise it. Currently, this law is being challenged in the High Court of South Africa, and in this article I critically explore salient ethical facets of the dispute. I argue that the law is unjust and should be revised.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Ethical issues in gestational surrogacy.Rosalie Ber - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (2):153-169.
Surrogacy in Australia: New Legal Developments.Renate Klein - 2011 - Bioethics Research Notes 23 (2):23.
Fair trade international surrogacy.Casey Humbyrd - 2009 - Developing World Bioethics 9 (3):111-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-25

Downloads
1,440 (#29,969)

6 months
221 (#43,861)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thaddeus Metz
Cornell University (PhD)

References found in this work

Ghost in the Machine.Robert A. Burton - 2026 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 35 (1):72-72.
Ubuntu: an ethic for a new South Africa.Augustine Shutte - 2001 - Pietermaritzburg: Cluster Publications.
Family History.J. David Velleman - 2005 - Philosophical Papers 34 (3):357-378.
African and Western Moral Theories in a Bioethical Context.Thaddeus Metz - 2009 - Developing World Bioethics 10 (1):49-58.

View all 9 references / Add more references