Truth and Molinism

In Ken Perszyk, Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 50-72 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Molinism implies that, for every possible agent _S_ in every possible circumstance _C_, there are true propositions like _that if S were in C, S would freely do A_. Thus Molinism implies that there are true _counterfactuals of freedom_. This chapter begins by responding to a single argument against the claim that there are true counterfactuals of freedom. But this response will lead to positive conclusions about—and even a new characterization of—Molinism itself. In particular, this chapter will conclude that Molinism's fundamental commitment is that the world is a certain way. And if the world is the way that the Molinist says it is, then a variety of counterfactuals of freedom are true—and true because of how the world is.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Replies to Hasker and Zimmerman.Trenton Merricks - 2011 - In Ken Perszyk, Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 90-95.
Tilting at Molinism.Edward Wierenga - 2011 - In Ken Perszyk, Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 118-139.
Pro Haskeris Contradictione.Dean Zimmerman - 2011 - In Ken Perszyk, Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 78-89.
Molinism, Meticulous Providence, and Luck.Steven B. Cowan - 2009 - Philosophia Christi 11 (1):156-169.
Trenton Merricks on Some Anti‐Molinist Arguments.William Hasker - 2011 - In Ken Perszyk, Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 73-77.
Molinist Conditionals.Edwin Mares & Ken Perszyk - 2011 - In Ken Perszyk, Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 96-117.
Reconciling Omniscience and Freedom: Ockhamist and Molinist Strategies.Mark Daniel Linville - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Does Molinism Reconcile Freedom and Foreknowledge?Justin Mooney - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (2):131-148.
Molinism, Freedom, and Luck.Daniel Breyer - 2013 - Philosophia Christi 15 (2):415-432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
9 (#2,095,483)

6 months
7 (#1,438,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Dependence Response and Explanatory Loops.Andrew Law - 2020 - Faith and Philosophy 37 (3):294-307.
Recent Work on Molinism.Ken Perszyk - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (8):755-770.
Do God's Beliefs about the Future Depend on the Future?T. Ryan Byerly - 2015 - Journal of Analytic Theology 3:124-9.
Sin in Christian Thought.Kevin Timpe - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references