- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On strong compactness and supercompactness
Annals of Mathematical Logic 7 (4):327-359 (1975)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Supercompactness and level by level equivalence are compatible with indestructibility for strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (3-4):155-163.
Failure of GCH and the level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2003 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (6):587.
An L-like model containing very large cardinals.Arthur W. Apter & James Cummings - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (1):65-78.
Tallness and level by level equivalence and inequivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2010 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (1):4-12.
Failures of SCH and Level by Level Equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (7):831-838.
Indestructibility and the level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactness.Arthur W. Apter & Joel David Hamkins - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):820-840.
Supercompactness and measurable limits of strong cardinals II: Applications to level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (5):457-463.
Level by level equivalence and strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (1):51.
Diamond, square, and level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (3):387-395.
Indestructibility, instances of strong compactness, and level by level inequivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (7-8):725-741.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-17
Downloads
54 (#1,106,799)
6 months
9 (#1,214,406)
2014-01-17
Downloads
54 (#1,106,799)
6 months
9 (#1,214,406)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings.Robert M. Solovay - 1978 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 13 (1):73.
The lottery preparation.Joel David Hamkins - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (2-3):103-146.
How large is the first strongly compact cardinal? or a study on identity crises.Menachem Magidor - 1976 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 10 (1):33-57.
Applications of Pcf Theory to the Study of Ideals On.Pierre Matet - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (3):967-994.
Indestructibility and the level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactness.Arthur W. Apter & Joel David Hamkins - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):820-840.
References found in this work
From Accessible to Inaccessible Cardinals.H. J. Keisler & A. Tarski - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (3):411-411.
Boolean extensions and measurable cardinals.K. Kunen - 1971 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 2 (4):359.
Iterated Cohen Extensions and Souslin's Problem.R. M. Solovay & S. Tennenbaum - 1974 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (2):329-330.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation