At the Junction: Two Models of Business Responsibility for Modern Slavery

Human Rights Review 21 (3):313-335 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article develops a conceptual pattern of the reasons and scope of business responsibility for modern slavery. It introduces modern slavery as either relation or structure and designs an understanding of a broad and a narrow model of business responsibility, consisting of business power, internal and external realms of business conduct and public and private roles of companies. Crossing the two models of modern slavery with the two models of business responsibility, the article carves out the strengths and limits of their junctions. The continuous pendulum between the junctions allows to discuss how and why companies can be responsible for modern slavery. It thus contributes analytically, practically and normatively to tackling modern slavery.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Combating Modern Slavery.Robin T. Byerly - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:124-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-07

Downloads
64 (#937,607)

6 months
13 (#935,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model.Iris Marion Young - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):102-130.
Power: A Radical View.Steven Lukes & Jack H. Nagel - 1976 - Political Theory 4 (2):246-249.
Silence as Complicity.Florian Wettstein - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (1):37-61.
Private Political Authority and Public Responsibility.Stephen J. Kobrin - 2009 - Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (3):349-374.

View all 16 references / Add more references