How deep is your love?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):233-234 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The thesis that women will be more intent on staying alive fails to take into account that current strategies are those of the winners in the evolutionary race. Moreover, because like tends to mate with like, risk taking will be averaged out between the sexes. Finally, Campbell's narrow view of parental investment fails to acknowledge the indirect contributions of males.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

How deep is your love?Peter Cave - 2001 - The Philosophers' Magazine 16:56-56.
How Deep Is Your Love or, How Thinking as Such Defies the Weight(s) of Imperialism.Treena Balds & Timothy Morton - 2024 - In Lenart Škof, S. Sashinungla & Sigridur Thorgeirsdottir, Elemental-Embodied Thinking for a New Era. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 83-97.
How is maternal survival related to reproductive success?X. T. Wang & Ralph Hertwig - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):236-237.
Toward an evolutionary psychology of human mating.David M. Buss - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (1):39-49.
When women win.Laura Betzig - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):217-217.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#774,494)

6 months
17 (#651,247)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Notes.Grant Farred - 2019 - In Entre Nous: Between the World Cup and Me. New York, USA: Duke University Press. pp. 225-250.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references