AI and the Value of the Body

Abstract

Is it good to have a body? This question seems interesting, but hard to get a grip on, because all familiar welfare subjects have bodies. But we may soon be able to make AI welfare subjects that do not. This prospect helps us imagine what a disembodied life might be like, and compels us to assess its value. I argue that it is good to have a body—both for humans and for AIs. Embodiment provides what I call _physical agency_, constituted by sensory awareness and the capacity to directly and intentionally affect the physical world. I argue that physical agency is an intrinsic welfare good by considering cases in which it is absent or limited and by situating it in a broader picture of the good life. I assess the implications for philosophy of disability, and defend an analogy from human to AI welfare.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-05-13

Downloads
154 (#273,984)

6 months
154 (#79,753)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick McKee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations