This is metaphysics: an introduction

Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A lot of people want to know what makes a life worth living. Some people think that a person's life is worth living if and only if that person experiences a greater amount of pleasure than pain throughout the course of her life, and that a life is better or worse to the extent that the balance of pleasure over pain is higher or lower. But I think that the theory that a person's life is worth living if and only if that person experiences throughout her life a greater amount of pleasure than pain, and that a life is a better or worse life to the extent that the balance of pleasure minus pain in that life is higher or lower, is a false theory. Here is an argument against the theory that a person's life is worth living if and only if that person experiences throughout her life a greater amount of pleasure than pain, and that a life is a better or worse life to the extent that the balance of pleasure minus pain in that life is higher or lower.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-02

Downloads
62 (#969,576)

6 months
14 (#866,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kris McDaniel
Syracuse University

Citations of this work

Systematicity and Skepticism.Aaron Segal - 2024 - American Philosophical Quarterly 64 (1):1-18.
Metaontology.Kris McDaniel - 2025 - Cambridge University Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references