Due process procedures in faculty grievance codes

Journal of Business Ethics 17 (15):1653-1662 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze what some private universities are doing in the area of mediation and other alternative ways of solving faculty complaints – what some term "alternative dispute resolution." Special attention will be given to one of the most important ethical issues in this area at the operating level of individual universities – the due process procedures with respect to the processing of the grievances of individual faculty members in nonunionized colleges. The paper concludes with recommendations for university administrators and faculty senates, as well as recommendations for future research.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A framework for teaching business ethics.Alfonso R. Oddo - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3):293-297.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
102 (#497,412)

6 months
16 (#751,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Managers as Judges in Employee Disputes.Dennis J. Moberg - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4):453-477.

Add more citations

References found in this work

S.Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin - 2015 - In Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin, Kant-Lexikon. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 1995-2243.
S.Volker Briese, Michael Bolz & Toralf Reimer - 2010 - In Volker Briese, Michael Bolz & Toralf Reimer, Krankheiten in der Schwangerschaft: Handbuch der Diagnosen von A–Z. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
S.Peter Gratton & Paul John Ennis - 2014 - In Peter Gratton & Paul John Ennis, The Meillassoux Dictionary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 151-165.

Add more references