Detached Statements

Critica 49 (147):75-89 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Joseph Raz has introduced an interesting class of statements —detached statements— into the philosophical lexicon. In brief, such statements are normative statements, yet the speaker does not, in so uttering them, express or convey acceptance of the point of view of the hearer to whom they are addressed. I propose to offer a novel analysis of such statements. In brief, such statements will be analysed as wide-scope normative conditionals.

Other Versions

reprint McBride, Mark (2018) "Detached Statements". Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 49(147):75-89

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-19

Downloads
4 (#2,256,719)

6 months
1 (#2,184,524)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Context and Communication.Herman Cappelen & Josh Dever - 2016 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by Josh Dever.
Why Be Rational?Niko Kolodny - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):509-563.
Legality.Scott Shapiro - 2011 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Practical reason and norms.Joseph Raz - 1999 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 12 references / Add more references