- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Mathematical Beauty and the Evolution of the Standards of Mathematical Proof
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Beauty & Revolution in Science. By James W. McAllister.S. Shostak - 2001 - The European Legacy 6 (6):859-860.
On certain Leibniz's observation concerning the substantiation of mathematical statements.Krystyna Blachowicz - 1983 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 12 (4):143-145.
A Wittgensteinian account of the beauty of proofs.Santiago Jockwich Martinez - 2026 - Synthese 208 (2):63.
The dialectical tier of mathematical proof.Andrew Aberdein - 2011 - In Frank Zenker, Argumentation: Cognition & Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18--21, 2011. OSSA.
Schoonheid AlS argument: James W. McAllister, beauty and revolution in science, ithaca, etc. [REVIEW]T. Derksen - 1999 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 91 (3):168-173.
Mathematical rigor, proof gap and the validity of mathematical inference.Yacin Hamami - 2014 - Philosophia Scientiae 18-18 (1):7-26.
What are the limits of mathematical explanation? Interview with Charles McCarty by Piotr Urbańczyk.David Charles McCarty & Piotr Urbańczyk - 2016 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 60:119-137.
Audience role in mathematical proof development.Zoe Ashton - 2020 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 26):6251-6275.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-07-27
Downloads
33 (#1,530,670)
6 months
33 (#262,025)
2010-07-27
Downloads
33 (#1,530,670)
6 months
33 (#262,025)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Beauty Is Not Simplicity: An Analysis of Mathematicians' Proof Appraisals.Matthew Inglis & Andrew Aberdein - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica 23 (1):87-109.
Do Mathematicians Agree about Mathematical Beauty?Rentuya Sa, Lara Alcock, Matthew Inglis & Fenner Stanley Tanswell - 2024 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 15 (1):299-325.
Imagination, Aesthetic Feelings, and Scientific Reasoning.Cain Todd - 2020 - In Milena Ivanova & Stephen French, Aesthetics and Science. Routledge.
Fitting Feelings and Elegant Proofs: On the Psychology of Aesthetic Evaluation in Mathematics.Cain Todd - 2018 - Philosophia Mathematica 26 (2):211-233.
References found in this work
The four-color problem and its philosophical significance.Thomas Tymoczko - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):57-83.
Proofs and pictures.James Robert Brown - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):161-180.
Analogy in quantum theory: From insight to nonsense.Mario Bunge - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (4):265-286.
Erwin Schrödinger, Anschaulichkeit, and quantum theory.Henk W. de Regt - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (4):461-481.
Mathematical beauty and physical science.Harold Osborne - 1984 - British Journal of Aesthetics 24 (4):291-300.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation