Habermas' turn?

Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (1):21-36 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How a thinker comes to adopt or change a view may be regarded as either a strictly theoretical or biographical issue. First, looking backward at my completed philosophical-political profile of Habermas, I elucidate how biographical methodology can yield a coherent yet dynamically evolving profile rather than a static portrait. Second, examining Habermas’ thinking after 2000, the year my published biography of him ends, I venture a biographical-philosophical hypothesis that in what appears to be Habermas’ turn after 11 September 2001, or in his decisive self-choice, he is faithful to the basic motives and core intuitions that brought him to critical theory

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
144 (#299,313)

6 months
29 (#325,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Matustik
Arizona State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Faith and Knowledge.G. W. F. Hegel, Walter Cerf & H. S. Harris - 1981 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (1):63-64.
Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida.Jürgen Habermas - 2003 - University of Chicago Press. Edited by Jacques Derrida & Giovanna Borradori.
Death Penalty.Henk ten Have & Maria do Céu Patrão Neves - 2021 - In Henk ten Have & Maria do Céu Patrão Neves, Dictionary of Global Bioethics. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 387-387.

View all 14 references / Add more references