The inadequacy of a deontological analysis of Peer relations in organizations

Journal of Business Ethics 10 (2):133 - 139 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue for the inadequacy of the Kantian approach to the analysis of personal relations in business presented by Moberg and Meyer, in A Deontological Analysis of Peer Relations in Organizations (Journal of Business Ethics). It is unclear or implausible that the (mostly reasonable) principles of business relations they advocate really do follow from Kant's theory. Kant's theory, and deontological theories in general, do not yield reasonable principles of personal relations, particularly in the business context.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An applied ethical analysis system in business.Alan Wong & Eugene Beckman - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (3):173 - 178.
On the ethics behind “business ethics”.Dag G. Aasland - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):3-8.
A Role for Virtue Ethics in the Analysis of Business Practice.Daryl Koehn - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (3):533-539.
Business Ethics and Economics.Diane L. Swanson - 1999 - In Robert Frederick, A companion to business ethics. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 207–217.
Business Ethics – Deontologically Revisited.Edwin R. Micewski & Carmelita Troy - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 72 (1):17-25.
A Stewardship Model of Business-Community Relations.Deborah Vidaver Cohen - 1996 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 7:1107-1118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
89 (#611,343)

6 months
5 (#1,612,624)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?