AGI crimes? The role of criminal law in mitigating existential risks posed by artificial general intelligence

AI and Society 40 (4):2691-2701 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The recent developments in applications of artificial intelligence bring back discussion about risks posed by AI. Among immediate risks that need to be tackled here and now, there is also a possible problem of existential threats related to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). There is a discussion on how to mitigate those risks by appropriate regulations. It seems that one commonly accepted assumption is that the problem is global, and thus, it needs to be tackled first of all on an international level. In this paper, I argue that national criminal laws should also be considered one of the possible regulatory tools for mitigating threats posed by AGI. I propose to enact AGI crimes that complement the varieties of legal responses to existential risks that might motivate and speed up further regulatory changes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-05-20

Downloads
60 (#1,002,418)

6 months
30 (#311,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kamil Mamak
Jagiellonian University

Citations of this work

In defense of artificial suffering.Kamil Mamak - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-24.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Robots, Law and the Retribution Gap.John Danaher - 2016 - Ethics and Information Technology 18 (4):299–309.
Killer robots.Robert Sparrow - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):62–77.

View all 42 references / Add more references