The Case for a Parental Duty to Use Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Medical Benefit

American Journal of Bioethics 12 (4):3-11 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores the possibility that there is a parental duty to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for the medical benefit of future children. Using one genetic disorder as a paradigmatic example, we find that such a duty can be supported in some situations on both ethical and legal grounds. Our analysis shows that an ethical case in favor of this position can be made when potential parents are aware that a possible future child is at substantial risk of inheriting a serious genetic condition. We further argue that a legal case for a duty to use PGD for medical benefit can be made in situations in which potential parents have chosen to conceive through in vitro fertilization and know that any children conceived are at substantial risk of having a serious genetic condition

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-28

Downloads
205 (#196,869)

6 months
34 (#252,536)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 1971 - Oxford,: Harvard University Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford Paperbacks.
Reasons and Persons.Annette C. Baier - 1984 - Philosophical Books 25 (4):220-224.
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.

View all 26 references / Add more references