Family coercion and valid consent

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2) (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Coercion is commonly said to invalidate consent, and that is always true if the source of the coercion is the physician. However, if it is a family member who coerces the patient to consent, the resultant consent may be quite valid and treatment should proceed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consent Under Pressure: The Puzzle of Third Party Coercion.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):113-127.
Adequate Information, Competence, and Coercion.Bernard Gert - 2006 - In Bioethics: a systematic approach. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 213-236.
Contrastive Consent and Third Party Coercion.David Enoch - 2024 - Philosophers' Imprint 24 (1).
12CFBFraming the Book’s Inquiry.Tom Dougherty - 2024 - In Consent under Duress. Oxford United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the): Oxford University Press.
Why is Coerced Consent Worse Than No Consent and Deceived Consent?David Wendler & Alan Wertheimer - 2017 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (2):114-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#1,462,265)

6 months
36 (#241,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Consent Under Pressure: The Puzzle of Third Party Coercion.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):113-127.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references