Russell’s Higher-Order Judgement Relation

In On the Genealogy of Universals: The Metaphysical Origins of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 153-182 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter radically redraws the relationship between Russell and Wittgenstein in the 1910s, overturning the orthodox theory that Wittgenstein sunk Russell’s multiple theory of judgement. Starting from 1903, the chapter explains how Russell’s conception of the particular–universal distinction evolved under pressure from both developments in his thinking about the nature of judgement and the nature of relations, concerning the unity of the former and the direction of the latter. This shows that Russell wasn’t overcome by Wittgenstein’s criticisms of his multiple relation theory of judgement in 1913 and that Russell continued to develop the multiple relation theory up until 1919.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Acquaintance, presentation and judgement: from Brentano to Russell and back again.Mark Textor - 2024 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 67 (1):262-288.
Russell on Negative Judgement.Anssi Korhonen - 2020 - Topoi 39 (3):727-742.
Russell's theory of judgment.Michael Potter - 2008 - In Wittgenstein's Notes on Logic. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 118-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-22

Downloads
1 (#2,387,199)

6 months
1 (#2,183,676)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fraser MacBride
University of Manchester

References found in this work

A World of States of Affairs. - 1997 - Philosophy 74 (287):130-134.
Mysticism and logic.Bertrand Russell - 1918 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
Ueber Begriff und Gegenstand.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Vierteljahrsschrift Für Wissenschaftliche Philosophie 16 (2):192-205.

View all 22 references / Add more references