Distinguo: The response to equivocation [Book Review]

Argumentation 2 (4):465-482 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Logical guarantees of validity must be understood as subject to the proviso that no equivocation is committed. But we do not have a formal theory of equivocation. This paper attempts to formulate rules for responding to equivocal arguments in the context of dialogue. What occurs when one distinguishes meanings of an equivocal expression turns out to be rather different from definition

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On equivocation.Tom Stoneham - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (4):515-519.
Further antidotes: A response to Gundersen.Alexander Bird - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (199):229-233.
Logical Consequence and the Paradoxes.Edwin Mares & Francesco Paoli - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):439-469.
Equivocal reporting: Ethical communication issues. [REVIEW]David F. Bean - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):65-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-04

Downloads
83 (#676,440)

6 months
21 (#498,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?