Russell and Wittgenstein on Incongruent Counterparts and Incompatible Colours

Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 35 (1):43-58 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Russell (in _Principles of Mathematics_) and Wittgenstein (in _Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus_) largely agree on the twin questions of why pairs of congruent objects cannot always be made to coincide and why surfaces can never be uniformly two colours at once. Both philosophers take space and colour to be mathematically representable, construe the relevant impossibilities as mathematical and hold that mathematical impossibility is at root logical. It is not by chance that Russell says nothing about the phenomena in his Introduction to the _Tractatus_ or surprising that Wittgenstein was unmoved by the objection that his account of colour incompatibility puts paid to his early philosophy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Incongruent counterparts and modal relationism.Carolyn Brighouse - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):53 – 68.
A remark on Kant's argument from incongruent counterparts.Jeremy Byrd - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4):789 – 800.
Temporally Incongruent Counterparts.Hud Hudson - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):337-343.
Kant on incongruent counterparts.William Harper - 1991 - In James Van~Cleve & Robert E. Frederick, The Philosophy of Right and Left: Incongruent Counterparts and the Nature of Space. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 263-313.
Hands, screws, triangles and absolute space.Nenad Filipovic - 2009 - Filozofija I Društvo 20 (2):279-302.
Incongruent Counterparts and Causality.Sean Walsh - 2007 - Kant Studien 98 (4):418-430.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-14

Downloads
645 (#89,256)

6 months
242 (#35,800)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Wittgenstein and Scientific Representation.Andrew Lugg - 2019 - Wittgenstein-Studien 10 (1):211-226.
Wittgenstein on colour exclusion : not fatally mistaken.Andrew Lugg - 1986 - In Abraham Zvie Bar-On, Grazer Philosophische Studien. Distributed in the U.S.A. By Humanities Press. pp. 1-21.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Investigating Wittgenstein.Merrill B. Hintikka - 1986 - New York, NY, USA: Blackwell. Edited by Jaakko Hintikka.
Some Remarks on Logical Form.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1929 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 9 (1):162 - 171.

Add more references