Oliver Hill: An Impertinent Ass - A Puritan Mystic and Cambridge Philosopher at the Royal Society, 1677–1682

Journal of Early Modern Studies 14 (1):89-123 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The early Royal Society was an intellectual movement with remar­kably homogenous epistemological and methodological features. Despite the petty squabbles fellows occasionally engaged in, general agreement existed among them about the principles, methods, and aims of their collective enterprise. On rare occasions, however, the society was genuinely infiltrated by someone with incompatible conceptions and principles, upsetting the sober equilibrium of society meetings. One spectacular example of such an intruder was the Cambridge-educated Oliver Hill who was fellow of the society from 1677 to 1682. This paper offers an account of Hill’s short tenure and studies some possible sources for better reconstructing two discourses, today lost, that he presented at meetings in December and January 1677/78. The paper aims to show how Hill, most often presented as a puritan mystic, also pursued a natural philosophical project in which he defended a specula­tive philosophy and spiritualist cosmology not unlike Henry More’s.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Nature of the Early Royal Society: Part I.K. Theodore Hoppen - 1976 - British Journal for the History of Science 9 (1):1-24.
Oldenburg and the art of Scientific Communication.Marie Boas Hall - 1965 - British Journal for the History of Science 2 (4):277-290.
The Royal Society, natural history and the peoples of the ‘New World’, 1660–1800.John Gascoigne - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Science 42 (4):539-562.
Methodology and Apologetics: Thomas Sprat's History of the Royal Society.P. B. Wood - 1980 - British Journal for the History of Science 13 (1):1-26.
Robert Hooke.John Sutton - 2001 - In [no title]. pp. 202-203.
Academic Scepticism and the Early Royal Society.Benjamin D. Hill - 2016 - In Sébastien Charles & Plínio Junqueira Smith, Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 103-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-09-06

Downloads
34 (#1,507,980)

6 months
23 (#436,577)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations