- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Right Answer, Wrong Question: Special Access, Knowledge Generation, and Clinical Trial Legitimacy
American Journal of Bioethics 14 (11):22-24 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Knowing the Answer.Jonathan Schaffer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):383-403.
Knowing what I want.Alex Byrne - 2011 - In JeeLoo Liu & John Perry, Consciousness and the Self: New Essays. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Toward a Commonsense Answer to the Special Composition Question.Chad Carmichael - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):475-490.
The legitimacy of clinical knowledge: Towards a medical epistemology embracing the art of medicine.Kirsti Malterud - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (2).
Off-trial access to experimental cancer agents for the terminally ill: balancing the needs of individuals and society.Manik Chahal - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (6):367-370.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-10-18
Downloads
75 (#776,948)
6 months
14 (#834,587)
2014-10-18
Downloads
75 (#776,948)
6 months
14 (#834,587)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Innovative Practice, Clinical Research, and the Ethical Advancement of Medicine.Jake Earl - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (6):7-18.
Special Access Programs Warrant Further Critical Attention: Authors' Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethical Justifications for Access to Unapproved Medical Interventions: An Argument for (Limited) Patient Obligations”.Mary Jean Walker, Wendy A. Rogers & Vikki Entwistle - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (11):W1 - W2.
References found in this work
Ethical Justifications for Access to Unapproved Medical Interventions: An Argument for (Limited) Patient Obligations.Mary Jean Walker, Wendy A. Rogers & Vikki Entwistle - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (11):3-15.
Terminal illness and access to phase 1 experimental agents, surgeries and devices: Reviewing the ethical arguments.Udo Schüklenk & Christopher Lowry - 2009 - British Medical Bulletin 89 (1):7-22.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation