- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: General and special theories of an act of control
Psychological Review 121 (1):66-95 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control.Gordon D. Logan & William B. Cowan - 1984 - Psychological Review 91 (3):295-327.
Jan-Frans Verbruggen. De slag bij Guinegate 7 Augustus 1479. De verdediging van het graafschap Vlaanderen tegen de koning van Frankrijk 1477-1480. [REVIEW]Serge Boffa - 1997 - Revue Belge de Philologie Et D’Histoire 75 (2):520-524.
The Jeffreys–Lindley paradox: an exchange.Alexander Ly, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Joshua L. Cherry & Jeremy Gray - 2023 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 77 (4):443-449.
The ubiquitous Laplacian assumption: Reply to Lee and Wagenmakers (2005).David Trafimow - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (3):669-674.
The Metaphysicial Foundations of American History: By Roland Van Zandt.Roland van Zandt - 1959 - 's-Gravenhage, Mouton.
Hedonic value of intentional action provides reinforcement for voluntary generation but not voluntary inhibition of action.Jim Parkinson & Patrick Haggard - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (4):1253-1261.
Henry Van Zandt Cobb, "Man's Way: A First Book in Philosophy". [REVIEW]L. Harold Dewolf - 1943 - Philosophical Forum 1:40.
Estimating systematic and random sources of variability in perceptual decision-making: A reply to Evans, Tillman, & Wagenmakers (2020).Roger Ratcliff & Philip L. Smith - 2021 - Psychological Review 128 (5):988-994.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
114 (#420,296)
6 months
22 (#488,109)
2016-06-30
Downloads
114 (#420,296)
6 months
22 (#488,109)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Task representation in individual and joint settings.Wolfgang Prinz - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
Inhibitory control in mind and brain 2.0: Blocked-input models of saccadic countermanding.Gordon D. Logan, Motonori Yamaguchi, Jeffrey D. Schall & Thomas J. Palmeri - 2015 - Psychological Review 122 (2):115-147.
Strategic attention and decision control support prospective memory in a complex dual-task environment.Russell J. Boag, Luke Strickland, Shayne Loft & Andrew Heathcote - 2019 - Cognition 191:103974.
What does it mean to inhibit an Action? A Critical Discussion of Benjamin Libet’s Veto in a Recent Study.Robert Reimer - 2022 - Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2021 Collocated Workshops. SEFM 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 13230.
Intrinsic Connectivity Networks in the Self- and Other-Referential Processing.Gennady G. Knyazev, Alexander N. Savostyanov, Andrey V. Bocharov, Evgeny A. Levin & Pavel D. Rudych - 2020 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14.
References found in this work
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.J. R. Stroop - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (6):643.
Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Richard M. Shiffrin & Walter Schneider - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (2):128-90.
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.Matthew M. Botvinick, Todd S. Braver, Deanna M. Barch, Cameron S. Carter & Jonathan D. Cohen - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (3):624-652.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation