The difference between metacognition and mindreading: Evidence from functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The relationship between metacognition and mindreading was investigated by examining how well one can monitor their own learning compared to another person’s learning. Here, we used functional near-infrared spectroscopy to systematically investigate the brain area activation during metacognition and mindreading. The evidence indicated that metacognition and mindreading are underpinned by distinct neural systems. Metacognition is associated with activation in brain regions important for memory retrieval, such as the fusiform gyrus, while mindreading is associated with activation in brain regions important for understanding and reasoning about others’ intentions, such as the right temporoparietal junction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Metacognition, mindreading, and insight in schizophrenia.Ben Wiffen & Anthony David - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):161-162.
Metacognition is prior.Justin J. Couchman, Mariana V. C. Coutinho, Michael J. Beran & J. David Smith - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):142-142.
Social-affective origins of mindreading and metacognition.Philippe Rochat - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):160-161.
Mindreading underlies metacognition.Peter Carruthers - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):164-182.
Overlooking metacognitive experience.Joëlle Proust - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):158-159.
Non-interpretative metacognition for true beliefs.Ori Friedman & Adam R. Petrashek - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):146-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-27

Downloads
58 (#1,037,073)

6 months
23 (#437,920)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?