Exploring ethical aspects of elective surgery patients' decision-making experiences

Nursing Ethics 20 (6):672-683 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The practice of respecting patients’ autonomy is rooted in the healthcare professionals’ empathy for patients’ situations, without which appropriate supports to the patients during the informed consent process may be remarkably moderated. The purpose of this study was to explore elective surgery patients’ experiences during their decision-making process. This research was conducted using a phenomenological approach, and the data analysis was guided by Colaizzi’s method. A total of 17 participants were recruited from a hospital in southern Taiwan. Two major themes emerged from the analyses: (a) a voluntary yet necessary alternative—to undergo a surgery and (b) alternatives compelled by the unalterable decision—the surgery. It was concluded that unless healthcare professionals can empathize with the distressed situation of their patients who are facing elective surgery, the practice of informed consent may become merely a routine. Nurses can be the best advocates for patients and facilitators to enhance communication between patients and healthcare personnel

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-24

Downloads
85 (#653,977)

6 months
27 (#346,108)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it.Paul F. Colaizzi - 1978 - In Ronald S. Valle & Mark King, Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 6.
Toward a Reconstruction of Medical Morality.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (2):65-71.
More information, broader dissent on informed consent.William R. LaFleur - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):15 – 16.

Add more references