Multiple realization and expressive power in mathematics and ethics

In Uri D. Leibowitz & Neil Sinclair, Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics: Debunking and Dispensability. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to a popular ‘explanationist’ argument for moral or mathematical realism the best explanation of some phenomena are moral or mathematical, and this implies the relevant form of realism. One popular way to resist the premiss of such arguments is to hold that any supposed explanation provided by moral or mathematical properties is in fact provided only by the non-moral or non-mathematical grounds of those properties. Many realists have responded to this objection by urging that the explanations provided by the higher-level, moral and mathematical, properties are informative in a way in which their supposed replacements are not, and that this is because moral and mathematical properties are multiply realizable. This chapter responds to this manoeuvre by proposing a way in which moral and mathematical explanations might preserve the distinctive import that multiple realizability brings, without committing those who accept them to the existence of moral and mathematical properties.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Grounding, Explanation, and Multiple Realization in Mathematics and Ethics.David Liggins - 2016 - In Uri D. Leibowitz & Neil Sinclair, Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics: Debunking and Dispensability. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 168-184.
Mathematical Explanations Of Empirical Facts, And Mathematical Realism.Aidan Lyon - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):559-578.
Moral Explanation for Moral Anti-Realism.Alexander Miller - 2016 - In Uri D. Leibowitz & Neil Sinclair, Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics: Debunking and Dispensability. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 149-167.
Platonism and intra-mathematical explanation.Sam Baron - 2024 - Philosophical Quarterly 75 (3):812-833.
Mathematical and Moral Disagreement.Silvia Jonas - 2020 - Philosophical Quarterly 70 (279):302-327.
Outlines of a theory of structural explanations.Philippe Huneman - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (3):665-702.
Non-Optional Projects.Alan Baker - 2016 - In Uri D. Leibowitz & Neil Sinclair, Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics: Debunking and Dispensability. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 220-235.
Moral Facts and Best Explanations.Brian Leiter - 2001 - Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2):79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-29

Downloads
189 (#213,706)

6 months
18 (#649,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Liggins
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

Normative Indispensability.Debbie Roberts - 2025 - In Simon Kirchin, The future of normativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 114-136.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Philosophy of Philosophy.Timothy Williamson - 2008 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.Gideon Rosen - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann, Modality: metaphysics, logic, and epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 109-135.
Realism, Mathematics & Modality.Hartry Field - 1989 - New York, NY, USA: Blackwell.
The nature of morality: an introduction to ethics.Gilbert Harman - 1977 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references